logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.07.01 2016고단404
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for eight months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 70,000 won, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of 2,00,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant G, who conspired to commit the crime, was aware of the fact that he was able to get a loan more than the ordinary credit loan in the event of obtaining a loan from a financial institution while he was aware of the fact that he was able to obtain a loan by using a false lease contract form with the knowledge that he was able to obtain a loan.

Defendant A was introduced from H.

Defendant

A received a request from Defendant G to prepare a written request for a pre-tax agreement to obtain a pre-tax loan from Defendant G, and accepted it, and requested Defendant B who was aware of it to ask for a pre-tax agreement, and Defendant B requested Defendant C to prepare and request a pre-tax agreement to obtain a pre-tax loan.

2. According to the Defendants’ conspiracy to commit the crime as above, Defendant C prepared an apartment charter contract with the head of the J-authorized Brokerage Office of around May 21, 2015, stating that “A lessor, lessee, and deposit KRW 130,00,00,000,000,000,000,000,000 from May 24, 2015 to May 23, 2017, the fact that Defendant C had not entered into a charter contract with Defendant G, despite the absence of the fact that Defendant C had entered into a charter contract with Defendant G, the fact that Defendant C was in possession of “Seoul-si I, 1 and 112,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,00,00,00.

L’s painting was stamped.

As a result, the Defendants forged one set of an apartment lease contract in the name of L, a private document on rights and obligations without authority for the purpose of exercising the rights and obligations.

3. The Defendants’ presentation of the above investigation document and Defendant G’s fraud with respect to the Defendants, as above, did not know that the letter of apartment lease agreement prepared by the Plaintiff, a new financial center in the Seoul-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Inc. on May 21, 2015, as described in paragraph (2), was forged. As above, Defendant G did not know that the said document was forged.

arrow