logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2014.08.20 2014고정391
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 01:00 on January 31, 2014, the Defendant and C expressed a frying out of the 3rd floor E-management of the victims in Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si, and talked with each other, and on this, the Defendant and C expressed a frying to the said frying room on the ground that sexual customers who were in the said frying room are “the frying frying frying frying frying fying fying fying fying fying fying fying fying fying fying fying fying fying fying fying fying fying fying fying fying fying fying fying fying fying fying fying fying fying fying.

2. The defendant's sole criminal conduct;

A. The injured Defendant avoided disturbance at the time and place described in paragraph (1), such as as described in paragraph (1), and caused the injury to the said G, on the ground that the victim G (the 17 years of age), and H (the 23 years of age), by putting the head debt of the said G, pushed the head debt of the said G, pushed the head debt of the said G, pushed the body part of the said H, pushed the head debt of the said G, pushed the tight back to the floor, pushed the body part of the said G, thereby cutting down the area above the floor. In addition, the injury to the said G, such as dump, tensions, etc. of the bones in need of two-day medical treatment, and the injury to the said H, such as salt, tension, etc. in need of two-month medical treatment, respectively.

B. On January 31, 2014, at around 02:00, the Defendant received a report that the disturbance was avoided from a so set set of paragraph (1) at the place specified in paragraph (1), and reported that the police officer of the Kimcheon Police Station I police box dispatched to the site would arrest the above Category C as a flagrant offender at suspicion of interference with his/her duties, thereby obstructing the Defendant’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the investigation and maintenance of order of the police officer at the same time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding C;

1. Each police statement of E, G, and H;

1. To attach a report of investigation to a diagnosis document;

arrow