The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

1. The grounds for the court’s explanation concerning this case, including the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance, are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the modification of each of the relevant parts as stated in the following 2. Thus, they are quoted as it is in accordance

2. Revised parts

A. Two pages 9 "the filing date or registration date of the application" and "the June 26, 2007" respectively are amended as follows: "the filing date or registration date of the application/registration date/the registration date of the June 26, 2009" and "the filing date of November 12, 2007/ May 21, 2009/ June 26, 2009":

B. As follows, the part of the two pages 11 up to 2 pages 11 up to 2 pages 2 up to 11.

B. From around around 2007, the Plaintiff imported and sold the wooden tree made of Australia (green trees and amamhorre). However, the Plaintiff’s Internet website referred to the Dogma that the Dogma imported and sold by the Plaintiff as “ Cambodia” and the Dogma was promoted that the Dogma was created as Australia’s Cambodia.

C. From June 2013, the Defendant imported a wooden horse from Australia and sold it in Korea by marking “Nure” on the surface of the product, and advertised the wooden horse imported and sold by the Defendant on the Internet website as a horse created from Australia Cambodia. The Defendant registered the Internet portal site “W.naver.com” as a search fishing on the Internet portal site, but deleted around August 2013.

(c)each entry and image of Category A(A) to B(3) in two pages 12 are as follows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 19, 20, 9, 120, 9, 17-1 to 5, 24, 17, 17

D. From June 2013, the amended part of the third 3rd 3rd 3rd 3rd 3rd 3rd 3rd 3rd 3rd 3rd 3rd 3rd 3rd 3rd 3rd 3rd 3rd 3rd 3rd 3rd 3rd 4th 4th 4th 5th 4th 5th 4th 4th 5th 4th 5th 4th 5th 4th 5th 106