The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case, such as the quoted of the judgment of the court of first instance, are as follows 2. The court's explanation concerning the plaintiff's assertion is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (including its attached Form) except for the addition of the following 3 judgments as to the plaintiff's assertion in this court. Thus, it shall be cited as it is

2. Parts to be dried;

(a) On the 2nd 6th 6th 6th 6th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 6th 7th 7th 7th 6th 7th 7th 6th 7th 7th 6th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 700

B. On the two pages, the following five revisions to “ April 1, 2015” to “ January 4, 2015”:

(c) revise “G” to “H” two pages below.

(d) modify the three pages “(3)” to “not specifying otherwise; hereinafter the same shall apply);

(e) revise “Evidence 11, 12, and 13 of Category A” to “Evidence 10 to 13 of Category A;

F. It is difficult to readily conclude that the Plaintiff’s writing of the instant bulletin board dated January 20, 2015 imitates the Plaintiff’s above 19 January 19, 2015, in light of the content of the 6th 7th 7th eth 7th eths to 6th 8th eths “only eth .g.,” as follows.

(g) Revisions to six pages 11 of "Monomeny....."

H. On January 16, 2015, the Plaintiff already mentioned the starting theory of the end of the 21st day in the instant Lart as of January 16, 2015. On January 15, 2015, Defendant B cited it in the instant bulletin board as of January 19, 2015, and accordingly, the Defendants asserted that the Defendants infringed on the Plaintiff’s copyright. Accordingly, according to the Plaintiff’s statements in the instant bulletin board as of January 19, 2015, as of January 16, 2015, the supply price of the instant Lart as of January 16, 2015 was anticipated to have been decreased until sunrise.