logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2016.07.26 2016고단58
상해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 14, 2016, the Defendant, in front of the victim D (n, 78 years of age) located in Jeong-gu, Jung-gu, Jung-gu, the victim's grandchildren brought about the defendant's lecture, and the Defendant resisted the victim with the Defendant's mother F along with the Defendant's mother F. On the ground that the victim's son and F were in dispute, the victim's bucks were in possession of the victim's bucks once, and caused the victim's bucks injury to the brain that requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Investigation report (related to diagnosis reports and photographs attached to the upper part);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the image photographs of the victim;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for the observation of protection [the scope of recommendation] general injury [the scope of punishment] of the basic area (the period from April to one year and six months of imprisonment] (the person subject to special mitigation] / The victim (the defendant's decision of sentencing] who is vulnerable to the crime of this case where the defendant inflicts an injury upon the aged victims living in the same village at the end of the minor dispute, is not good enough to commit the crime of this case. The fact that the crime of this case is not good, the injury suffered by the victim is disadvantageous to the defendant. The fact that the defendant is a disabled person of Grade 2 of intellectual disability, and that the defendant agreed smoothly with the victim during the trial of this case only with the victim during the trial of this case is favorable to the defendant.

In addition to the above circumstances, all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case shall be determined as per the disposition.

arrow