1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

Defendant B’s KRW 7 million on June 20, 2018 to the Plaintiff and this.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The relation 1) The Plaintiff is D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Nonindicted Company”).

(2) Defendant B is a major shareholder and a substantive operator. Defendant B is the Plaintiff’s relative, who was appointed on April 6, 2015 by the Plaintiff’s proposal to the representative director of the non-party company. (2) Defendant C is an attorney-at-law, who has defended E in the case of bribery of E related to the Plaintiff.

나. 이메일 열람행위 등 1) 소외 회사가 전자제품 공급과 관련하여 거래처로부터 선금을 받고도 제품을 공급하지 못하여 피해변제를 독촉 받던 상황에서, 원고는 2016. 3. 17.경 피고 B에게 ‘채권자들이 당신에게 연락을 많이 하니, 당신 휴대폰을 사용하지 말고, 내가 사용하는 휴대폰을 줄 테니 이 휴대폰으로 나와 전화 연락을 하자’고 말하며 원고가 사용하던 휴대폰 피고 B가 원고의 부탁에 따라 자신의 명의로 개통하여 원고에게 건네준 것이었다. 을 건넸다. 2) 피고 B는 2016. 3. 23.부터 2016. 4. 14.까지 위 휴대폰을 이용하여 원고의 이메일(F)에 접속하여 소외 회사의 차용증 등 회계자료(이하 ‘이 사건 이메일 자료’이라 한다)를 다운로드 하거나 다른 휴대폰으로 사진을 찍어 저장하였다

(3) Defendant B submitted the instant e-mail data as evidence upon filing a complaint with the Plaintiff on April 15, 2016 under the charge of violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Embezzlement). Meanwhile, among the facts stated in the complaint, the Plaintiff paid a sum of KRW 15 million to E on February 3, 2016 and March 8, 2016 included the details that the Plaintiff paid the sum of KRW 15 million. After the Plaintiff’s report to the media organization, the case of acceptance of bribe was rejected. 4) Defendant C was subject to the questioning of the suspect prior to the Plaintiff’s arrest to E, and the said KRW 15 million paid to E was a loan or was a bribe.