Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, imprisonment with prison labor of Defendant C for one year, imprisonment with prison labor of Defendant D for ten months, Defendant B, E, and F.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “F”) was awarded a contract for 666 billion won in construction amount from a foundation M on July 2, 2014, for the construction amount of 666 billion won (a change to 6.95 billion won in construction amount as of June 1, 2015) by the Corporation M, a Corporation, the Foundation M, and the Construction Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “F”) of Ulleung-gun N Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “O Construction Corporation”).

Defendant

A entered the F on March 1, 2014 and controlled the field affairs, such as the progress and management of the construction site, demand for funds, and execution, as a site manager of the construction site of this case.

1. Defendant A’s fraud of claiming for false construction expenses shall prepare a false report on the occurrence of construction expenses in relation to the instant construction works, a general statement of demanding funds and a written request for field funds, which are attached thereto, and send them to the victim F.

The work cost had been claimed to unrefilledly.

Therefore, the Defendant, even though the actual construction cost of the construction cost of the instant construction works is KRW 14 million, made a request for site funds to the effect that, around September 2014, P, an on-site employee, entered the construction cost of KRW 33 million from the construction site office of the instant construction site office, and then sent it to the victim after obtaining approval from the Defendant.

The above construction cost was claimed.

The Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) obtained KRW 33,00,000 from the victim on November 10, 2014 through the Agricultural Cooperative Account (75703-51-01923) under the name of Heung Construction on the said construction cost; and (c) acquired KRW 19,000,000,000, which is the difference, from January 15, 2015, by deceiving the victim through the same method, and acquired KRW 106,130,000 in total over four times, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table.

2. Fraud of Defendant A, C, E, or B’s false labor cost claim

A. As to the instant construction project, Defendant A and C loaned the name of Q, one’s wife, and Defendant A conspired to use it to charge the victim F with false labor costs.

Therefore, on April 30, 2015, Defendants were to perform the instant construction work.