All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

In light of the circumstances stated in its holding, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that acquitted Defendant F on the ground that the dispersion order issued by the police at the time cannot be deemed a lawful dispersion order based on the Assembly and Demonstration Act, and that there was no evidence to prove the crime among the facts charged against Defendant D and the facts charged against Defendant F.

The judgment below

In light of the records, the above judgment of the court below is just and acceptable. Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors of misapprehending the legal principles by misapprehending the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules.

After finding facts as indicated in its holding, the lower court reversed the first instance judgment convicting Defendant D on the ground that there was no proof of the crime regarding the part of the fact of defamation by publication among the facts charged against Defendant D, the facts charged against Defendant E, the facts charged against Defendant E, the facts charged against Defendant A by publication of July 20, 2008, and the facts charged against Defendant A by publication of August 20, 208, and the facts charged against defamation by publication of August 20, 2008.

The judgment below

In light of the records, the above judgment of the court below is just and acceptable. Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors of misapprehending the legal principles by misapprehending the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules.

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.