1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the following order for payment shall be revoked, and that part shall be revoked.

1. The reasons why this Court is stated in this part of the basic facts are the same as “1. Basic Facts” in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, and such a part shall be cited as they are, in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, as it excludes the following parts.

The margin between the order and the purport of the claim, the purport of the claim, and the reasons when calculating the number of parallels No. 12 on the 2nd page, did not appear to be one.

The council of occupants' representatives shall appoint the "council of occupants' representatives" to "council of occupants' representatives" (hereinafter referred to as the "council of occupants' representatives of this case").

The council of occupants' representatives of the apartment of this case in Chapter 3 of the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs shall be appointed to "the council of occupants' representatives of this case".

Part 3, part 10 " was finally determined," and part 10 " was finally determined (hereinafter in this case referred to as "relevant criminal case")."

Sheet 3 pages 11 to 12 (the explanation of the grounds for recognition of the basic facts) shall be written as follows.

[Ground for Recognition] Unstrifed Facts, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, 4, 6, 7 (including each number, hereinafter the same shall apply)

(i) the entry in Category B(1) and the purport of the entire pleadings;

2. The fire of this case, which is the cause of the plaintiff's claim, was derived from the defendant's severe crime, and the council of occupants' representatives of this case suffered property damage, such as the fire inside the underground parking lot of this case, etc., and thus, the defendant is liable for damages caused by the tort against

The amount of damages suffered by the instant council of occupants' representatives due to the Defendant's tort reaches KRW 218,142,450, and the Plaintiff paid the insurance money totaling KRW 218,142,450 to the instant council of occupants' representatives in accordance with the fire insurance contract of this case. As such, the damage claim against the Defendant by the instant council of occupants' representatives was transferred to the Plaintiff by subrogation by the insurer

Therefore, the defendant shall pay to the plaintiff the above KRW 218,142,450.