1. All appeals by the defendant against the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited as follows, and excluded the defendant from further determination of the grounds for appeal as set forth in paragraph 2 below, it is identical to the part against the defendant among the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance. As such, it is cited as a summary under the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

When calculating the number of conduct No. 8 on the third side, the margin between the order and the purport of the claim and the reasons is not considered to be one.

(hereinafter the same shall apply)

As for Defendant I and Co-Defendant I of the first instance trial (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant, etc.”) jointly Defendant I of the first instance trial, they were sentenced to the full acceptance of the Plaintiffs’ claims by the Plaintiffs pursuant to Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act, and as I did not appeal against the said judgment, the part of the first instance judgment against I in its judgment became final and conclusive as it is,” and all of the Defendants “B,” including the Defendant “.”

The Ministry of Education, Science and Technology Nos. 3, 9, and 1, 3, 3, 14, and 4 below all "Defendant J" shall be respectively taken into account as "I" and "Defendant J".

On July 10, 2019, the Supreme Court ruled that the appeal was dismissed on July 10, 2019 (see Supreme Court Decision 2019Do4781, Jul. 12, 2019).

(1) On the other hand, the Defendant, etc., and the Plaintiff, etc., were indicted as the head of the Daejeon District Court’s Incheon District Court Decision 2019Gohap21 and currently pending trial (hereinafter “relevant criminal cases”), which stated that “The Defendant, etc., would be able to guarantee a high-amount of profit and to attract investment funds from investors, the Defendant, etc., and the Plaintiff, as seen above, committed the act of attracting investment funds from investors.”

On the 4th page 4, 17-20 (hereinafter “the grounds for recognition”) are as follows.

[The fact that there is no dispute over the basis of recognition, which is obvious to this court.