Defendant

The appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. misunderstanding of facts 1) Violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. (a) against Victims F of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. (a)

(2) The Defendant did not have any fact of gathering beer’s disease from the victim F head. 2) The Defendant committed a violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (a group, deadly weapons, etc.) against the victim G (Article 1-2(b) of the original judgment) (Article 1-1(b) of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. (ab) in the course that the victim G knifes the Defendant’s hand and knife the knife’s knife in the victim G’s hand floor, thereby suffering from the victim G’s upper part, and there was no fact that

3) Violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. (Bodily Injury Caused by Group, Deadly Weapons, etc.) against the victim I (Article 1-C of the first instance judgment).

(B) The Defendant was only sicker’s wicker’s wicker’s wicker’s wicker’s wicker’s wicker’s wicker’s wicker’s wicker’s wicker’s wicker’s wicker’s wicker’s wicker.

2. Determination

A. Judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts

(1) The court below’s evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, i.e., the following circumstances: ① the victim F stated that “the Defendant was faced with the head of the Defendant,” consistent with the police and the court below’s ruling (Evidence No. 55, 56, and trial records No. 54, 55, and 58 of the evidence record); ② the victim I stated that “the Defendant was suffering from the Defendant,” and that “the Defendant was faced with the head of the Defendant, due to the difference of the F and the beer’s disease,” and corresponds to the victim F’s statement (Evidence No. 65, 66 of the evidence record); ③ the Defendant also testified the victim F’s disease at the time of the instant case at the prosecutor’s office (Evidence No. 170-172-2, etc. of the evidence record).