logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원포항지원 2016.09.08 2016가합10266
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The defendant is among each real estate listed in the separate sheet:

A. As to each share of the Plaintiff 44/561:

B. C 4. Each of 44.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. At around June 1948, I completed the registration of ownership transfer as to the 6th 2nd 4th son of J-gu, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, J-gu.

B. On April 16, 1968, in the above land, 500 2 parts, 2 parts, 400 square meters (51,967 square meters; hereinafter “instant land”) were divided into the said land.

C. On May 12, 1970, the Defendant completed the registration of transfer of ownership on the instant land in accordance with the Act on Special Measures for the Registration, etc. of Forest Ownership (Act No. 211, hereinafter “Special Measures Act”) (hereinafter “the Act”).

The land of this case was divided into several lots of land and substituted by several times since 1993, and the defendant sold or disposed of part of the partitioned and substituted land as above, and each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet among the land of this case is "each of the real estate of this case".

(E) The name of the Defendant remains in the name of the Defendant. E. I died on August 24, 1969, and his wife L, female C, male M, female N, 3 women, 4 South and North Defendant, 4 women D, and 4 women D (I’s son P and 3 South Korea P died in an unmarried state before I died.

) On May 16, 1993, L died on May 16, 1993, and succeeded to the property of the above C, etc., which is its children. M died on March 19, 2001 and succeeded to the property of R, S, T, and U, Q and children, and N died on December 27, 2007 and succeeded to the property of E, H, F, and G, their children. [Grounds for Recognition] There is no dispute, each entry (including the number of pages; hereinafter the same shall apply) in the evidence Nos. 1, 3, and 7.

- The purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The registration completed in accordance with the Act on Special Measures for the Prevention of Transfer of Ownership is presumed to be consistent with the substantive legal relationship, and there is no proof that the letter of guarantee or confirmation stipulated in the Act on Special Measures is false or forged, or that it is not a lawful registration due to other reasons.

arrow