A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the duty to drive the Grand Cross Cargo Vehicles in the Ireland.

On March 27, 2018, the Defendant driven the above cargo while under the influence of alcohol on March 27, 2018, and led the two-lane road of “D” located in Seopopo City C, Seopo City, to the south side of the filial road.

At the time, there are nights and there is a center line with the center of separation, so in such cases, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving the vehicle by driving the vehicle, such as thoroughly operating the vehicle in front and safely.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while neglecting the influence of alcohol, neglected to do so and neglected to do so and neglected to do so, received the central separation unit by the part of the front of the foregoing cargo vehicle.

The Defendant did not take any measure at the time of the occurrence of a traffic accident while destroying the above central separation unit by negligence in the course of performing his duties.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (refluence of drinking), at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), the Defendant did not take any measure at the time of the occurrence of a traffic accident while destroying the median line center of the above cargo lanes, as described in paragraph (1). On March 27, 2018, the Defendant driven under the influence of alcohol, such as the time and place specified in paragraph (1) and the distance between walking and walking. On March 27, 2018, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at the Defendant’s dwelling located in Seopopo City E and 201 Dong 103.

There are reasonable grounds to determine a seal, and it was demanded from around 02:30 on the same day to around 03:19 on the same day to respond to the measurement of drinking alcohol by inserting the whole breath in five times on the same day.

Nevertheless, the defendant refused to comply with a police officer's request for a measurement of breath without any justifiable reason by refusing such request for a measurement.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Report on the occurrence of a traffic accident;