logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.05.23 2018고단338
폭행등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On November 5, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 600,000 won by obstructing business operations at the Seoul Southern District Court and one year and six months by obstructing business operations, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Mapo Prison on March 9, 2016.

[2] On January 11, 2018, the Defendant: (a) 00:01, 201, the Defendant: (b) 2018 Go-man 338 assaulted the victim’s face at the “D shop” located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, which was requested by the victim E, the customer; (c) “the governance must be changed; (d) the victim’s blus blus blus blus blus blus blus blus blus blus blus blus blus blus blus bluss blus blus blus blus blus blus blus blus blus blus blus blus blus

around 12:37 February 10, 2018, the Defendant of “2018 Godan 963” refers to a victim I (inns and 51 years of age) who will take a bath in the H restaurant located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

In the same way, the victim's face was taken over by drinking, and the victim's face was scamed, and the victim's face was scamed, and the victim was scamed for treatment for about 14 days.

around 10:56 on February 8, 2018, the Defendant, “2018 Godan 1011,” committed a theft with one punishment under the victim’s test color, where the market price that the victim K residing in Guro-gu Seoul High Court is unknown on the L rooftop, where the victim K residing in Guro-gu Seoul High Court, was promptly set up.

around 19:35 on February 24, 2018, the Defendant referred to “L” operated by Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Council by the victim M on February 24, 2018, to the third third floor of “L”, and to the husband of the victim and the victim, whether the Defendant is a person to be designated by the low male;

The author committed an indecent act against his gender, and the denial was a hummatic and hummatic hummatic hummatic hump, which is a hummatic hump, and the hump was so that people who reside in the given notice could not use the hump.

This is the defendant.

arrow