logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.02.05 2014구합6067
개인택시운송사업면허취소처분취소
Text

1. On June 19, 2013, the Defendant’s revocation of the license for private taxi transport business against the Plaintiff is revoked.

2...

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On February 9, 2010, the Plaintiff is a person who has obtained a license for private taxi transport business (license number: B) from the Defendant and operates C cab (hereinafter “instant cab”) from around that time, and operates private cab business.

B. Revocation of driver's license against the plaintiff 1) The Commissioner of Seoul Local Police Agency (hereinafter referred to as the "Administrator of Seoul Local Police Agency").

() On April 4, 2013, the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant passenger”), around 00:50 on August 15, 2012, intended to rape and attempted to commit rape after the Plaintiff moved D (hereinafter “instant passenger”) to the instant taxi to the Han River and to the Han River Citizens Park (hereinafter “instant attempted rape”) (hereinafter “instant attempted rape”) (hereinafter “instant disposition revoking the instant driver’s license”) under Article 93(1)11 of the Road Traffic Act.

(2) On April 24, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an action with the Seoul National Police Agency seeking revocation of the instant driver’s license.

Accordingly, on July 9, 2014, the above court dismissed the Plaintiff’s claim on the ground that “this case’s driver’s license was revoked by mistake of fact, and was conducted within the discretionary scope of the Seoul Commissioner of the Seoul Local Police Agency.”

(3) On July 16, 2014, the Plaintiff appealed against the judgment of the first instance court on July 16, 2014 (Seoul Administrative Court 2013Gudan9116). On December 16, 2014, Seoul High Court accepted the Plaintiff’s claim that “this case’s driver’s license does not exist,” and revoked the judgment of the first instance court (Seoul High Court 2014Nu57951). On December 16, 2014, the Seoul High Court rendered a judgment that revoked the driver’s license of this case (Seoul High Court 2014Nu57951). The evidence that conforms to the grounds for the instant disposition that “the Plaintiff attempted to rape or forced indecent act by force of the passengers of this case,” among the evidence presented to the Plaintiff’s respective statements (No. 8

arrow