Of the facts charged in the instant case, the charge of violating the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) is not guilty. Of the facts charged in the instant case.

The acquittal portion

1. The summary of the facts charged is the person engaging in driving a two-wheeled motor vehicle of scooter.

On November 10, 2016, the Defendant driving the said two-wheeled vehicle without obtaining a driver's license of the said two-wheeled vehicle on November 14, 2016, and driving the said two-wheeled vehicle at the village of the old Dasan-si of the Dasan-si, the Defendant, from the perspective of the elderly information protection to the view of the s

2. According to each of the notice of decision on the suspension of driver's license and the copy of the written ruling bound in the records of trial, and each of the records of the decision on the suspension of driver's license, the defendant is from the Commissioner General of the Daegu Regional Police Agency on June 7, 2016.

7. A person who was subject to a disposition of driver's license as of October 21 of the same year, but filed an administrative adjudication against the said disposition authority on November 22, 201 of the same year to request the revocation of driver's license, and received a ruling on November 22 of the same year that "the first-class ordinary driver's license as of July 11, 2016 shall be changed to the first-class ordinary driver's license as of July 11, 201," and the defendant thereafter received a disposition of suspension of driver's license from the head of the police station on December 1 of the same year from July 11, 2016 to October 18, 2016.

On the other hand, Article 43 (3) of the Administrative Adjudication Act provides that "the commission has a reason to request a revocation trial."

If recognized, the administrative ruling of the National Police Agency provides that "the applicant shall be ordered to revoke or change the disposition or to change the disposition or to change the disposition or to any other disposition," the administrative ruling of the National Police Agency is not so-called formative ruling that "the change of the disposition or to any other disposition," but directly "the change of the disposition or disposition," in the form of the order. The defendant was issued by the above ruling of the National Police Agency head.

On July 11, 2016, the first-class ordinary driver's license revocation is based on the retroactive effect of the ruling accepting the revocation adjudication, and the date is calculated retroactively from July 11, 2016, which is the initial disposition date, as the starting point of the 110th day.