logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.02.02 2016구단12557
요양불승인처분취소
Text

1. On September 14, 2015, the Defendant’s disposition of non-approval for medical care rendered to the Plaintiff on September 14, 2015, is shouldered by the term “profesing soften,” and “profes.”

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On July 23, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application for medical care benefits with the Defendant on the following grounds: “(i) to cut the right-to-hand shoulder salt, ② to the right-to-hand shoulder salt, ③ to damage the power lines to the right-to-hand shoulder, ④ to cut off the right-to-hand shoulder, and damages in the order and net (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the instant injury”). On July 30, 2015, the Plaintiff claimed that “the instant injury was caused by the instant injury and disease by performing an daily work that may be unreasonable for the shoulder while performing the coal work for about 30 years from the gradic mining station and the strong coal mine.”

B. However, on September 14, 2015, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-approval of medical care (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on September 14, 2015, that “it is difficult to recognize an injury or disease as a business-related injury or disease due to lack of objective opinions to recognize the injury or disease, such as where the injury or disease is not clearly known.”

C. The Plaintiff filed a request for examination against the Plaintiff. However, on February 23, 2016, the Defendant rejected the request for examination on the following grounds: “In a self-scopical image, the observation of scopical scopical scopical scopical scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopics, scopic scopic scopic scopics, and scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopicsc

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, Eul evidence No. 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion is a work that imposes a significant burden on the shoulder part while working in coal mines for not less than 30 years.

arrow