logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2021.01.15 2017가단5040323
손해배상(언)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff’s basic fact is a psychiatrist, who operates the N Hospital in Incheon, from November 2, 2015 to November 2, 2015. Defendant F is a media company that runs the business of producing and supplying news reports programs, the business of producing broadcasting programs, etc. Defendant H is a reporter affiliated with Defendant F, Defendant G is a media company that operates news communications business, etc., Defendant G is a news company that operates news service business, etc., and Defendant I is a reporter affiliated with Defendant G.

Defendant J: (a) the chief of the O police station investigation division; (b) Defendant K and Defendant L as police officers of the O police station on January 24, 2017; (c) prepared the report materials stating the results of the investigation as shown in attached Form 1, and distributed them to media companies, etc.

Defendant H and Defendant I drafted on January 24, 2017, based on the foregoing news report materials and their coverage (hereinafter “instant news articles”), and Defendant F and Defendant G broadcasted them based on the said news articles and published them as news articles.

[Grounds for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, Eul evidence No. 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Defendant J, K, and L asserted the Plaintiff’s assertion on publication of news report materials and defamation via the instant news article, and Defendant J, K, and L forced the Plaintiff to perform the Plaintiff’s business operation expenses for hospital patients, and did not prepare a proper account book thereof, and distributed the report materials in attached Form 1, which contain the investigation result to the effect that some of the patients were accommodated in a hospital, and obtained illegal permission by forging the contract for disposal of laundry which was necessary for the establishment of the hospital. The remaining Defendants prepared and reported the instant news article based on the aforementioned news report materials.

However, all of the above news report materials and the article of this case revealed false facts.

In other words, some patients are not forced to work, but forced to work for the purpose of the safety and treatment of patients, and they are related to the time limit.

arrow