The defendant shall be innocent.

1. No person other than a person handling narcotics, etc., may sell, deliver, administer, or possess a psychotropic drug campopon (one camopon; hereinafter referred to as “copon”).

Nevertheless, at around 12:00 on January 28, 2012, the Defendant, who is not a person handling narcotics, sold 300,000 won to E from the Defendant’s rocketing car parked at the entrance of the Dware parking lot located in O.S., and 0.5g of phiphone, which was received during the injection period, sold phiphones.

2. The Defendant’s assertion consistently denies the facts charged while having consistently purchased phiphones from E from investigative agencies to this court.

3. As evidence that seems to correspond to the above facts charged, each of the statements in investigation agencies and courts of E, F’s statements in investigation agencies and courts of justice, investigation reports (Investigation Results Report No. 809), and recording records on the statement between the Defendant and E.

First of all, it is difficult to recognize credibility in light of not only the following, but also the motive or reason of the statement, and the circumstances leading to the statement, etc., as well as the motive or reason of the statement, it is difficult to recognize credibility.

① On March 5, 2012, E received 1g in the police investigation conducted by G on March 5, 2012, 3g in the investigation conducted by the prosecution conducted on July 11, 2012, and 1.6g in the investigation conducted by the prosecution conducted on March 28, 2013. On the other hand, in this court, G received 3-4 half in the amount of 5g (7g for injection) purchased from H.

(2) E is the end of January 2012 when the police investigation of March 5, 2012 was conducted with respect to the period of selling phiphonephones to the defendant.

2. On the other hand, in the prosecution investigation conducted on July 11, 2012, H around February 6, 2012, the Defendant philopon.