beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant, along with C, engaged in the manufacturing business of Aluminium materials and structures, etc. with the trade name “D”. For the purpose of preparing the business funds, the Defendant forged documents necessary for the application for the loan, and thought to obtain “gysium” loans to low-credit low-income earners.
1. In collusion with C on August 30, 2010, the Defendant forged one copy of the real estate lease agreement in the name of G, which is a private document document G, for the purpose of exercising the right and duty by placing the G seal affixed in advance on the lessor column, stating in the column “D” office located in the column of Jeju Special Self-Governing Province, “A million won” in the column of deposit, “A million won” in the remainder column, and “A thousand won” in the lessor column, and “E, F, and G” in the lessor column, without authority, in collusion with C, the Defendant forged one copy of the real estate lease agreement in the name of G, which is a private document document on the right and duty.
2. On September 15, 2010, the Defendant: (a) applied for a loan from a “Dongju Saemaul Savings Depository” in the Jeju-si 2 Do-dong 2164-1 on September 15, 2010; and (b) exercised the forged real estate lease agreement by granting it to H who is aware of the forgery.
3. In the time and place indicated in paragraph (2), the fraud Defendant submitted a forged real estate lease agreement, which is a document necessary for the application for a loan, even though the Defendant did not have leased the office from G, the Defendant acquired 14 million won from the victim to the end of October 15, 2010 to September 11, 2012, with the purport that “a corporate policy fund of KRW 14 million is operated by a business entity that is a stock company D, and a corporate policy fund of KRW 14 million is repaid every month from October 15, 2010 to September 11, 2012.”
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant's statement in court;