The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is a creditor who borrowed 10 million won to the victim, and the victim B borrowed money from the defendant.

The Defendant, on January 7, 2014, on the ground that: (a) around 18:00 on the 108 parking lots and the passage of 501, the offline 53 cm and 80 cm in length, on the ground that the Victim B did not pay the money to the Defendant; (b) whether the Defendant, on the ground that the Defendant did not receive any payment of the money from the victim B, (c) in the 108 parking lots and the passage of 500 cm in length, “in view of the fraud, d.e., 108 Dong 501 (B) was replaced by the fraud, without being subject to the tax calculation of the annual tax base of KRW 12,00,000 (original interest of KRW 12,00,000

After stating "after this, the victim was openly insulting the victim while going to the apartment parking lot and passage."

2. We examine the judgment. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act and can be prosecuted only when a complaint is filed under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the facts that the injured party submitted a written agreement on February 16, 2016, which was after the prosecution of the instant case, to the effect that the injured party would cancel the complaint against the accused. Thus, the prosecution of the instant case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(5) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.