1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The deceased E married with the deceased F, followed by G(the spouse of the Plaintiff), the South-North Defendant, the South-North net H(the death of September 2005), and the female I.

B. The deceased F owned a lot of land in JJ-gun, Busan, but donated to the Defendant, who is the south of the Republic of Korea, all of the real property other than the Busan Gun L and M, which was donated to K-gun, Busan, and the Do He, the office located in the G-gun, Busan.

C. On January 17, 200, the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of the defendant was completed with respect to the portion of 1653/18165 out of the land of this case owned C on the ground of "trade as of January 12, 2000," and with respect to the remaining portion of 16512/18135 shares, the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of the defendant was completed.

The latter is on July 9, 2008, the name of the network E out of the land in this case.

With respect to the share 1653/18165 in the statement in the port, the registration of ownership transfer in the name of G, the spouse of the plaintiff, was completed.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 8, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion was accepted in a considerable portion of the land owned by the Defendant in Busan-gun, Jin-gun, Busan-gun, which was inherited from the Defendant F, that the Defendant purchased the said land with compensation for expropriation, and requested the Plaintiff to purchase the instant land with approximately KRW 500 square meters upon request by the Plaintiff. Accordingly, the Plaintiff invested KRW 10 million (the purchase price for KRW 2,500), and the Defendant invested KRW 120 million (the purchase price for KRW 3,000) and KRW 1653/18165,000 (the purchase price for KRW 3,000) with the name of KRW 500,000, and the remaining portion was transferred to the Plaintiff’s spouse’s name on July 9, 2008.

In other words, the Plaintiff agreed to jointly purchase the land of this case with the Defendant and was actually responsible for the purchase amount of 2,500 square meters, and 500 square meters out of that was acquired, respectively, in the name of the Defendant, and the remaining 2,00 square meters.