The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On January 9, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for an injury, etc. at the Seoul Eastern District Court for six months on the same month; and on the 14th day of the same month, after the said judgment became final and conclusive.

3. 24. The suspension of execution is revoked, and the same year;

9. 4. A person who was sentenced to six months of imprisonment by the same court for a obstruction of the performance of official duties and completed the execution of the final sentence in an Ansan Prison on March 7, 2015, and is a member of the Company.

At around November 5, 2015, the Defendant: (a) received the phone of the victim E (at the age of 53) from the victim E (at the age of 53) to move the Defendant’s vehicle in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City around November 5, 2015; (b) received the victim’s vehicle from the victim E (at the age of 53); and (c) received the victim’s vehicle from the victim to the victim’s report, and then the police officer called out as the victim’s report; (d) on the front day of the former F-ro, the Defendant discarded the victim’s “the same year, the same year, the death

As referred to as “the victim’s body is likely to inflict any harm on the victim, etc., and the victim was frightened.

2. The crime of intimidation is a crime falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, which is a crime of intimidation under Article 283(3) of the same Act. According to the records, the victim may have expressed his/her wish not to punish the defendant on February 3, 2016, which is after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.