logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.03.22 2017고단3550
모욕
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) around 01:00 on November 3, 2017, the Defendant was punished for trial expenses as a matter of D and fare, which is a taxi engineer, who had been carrying the Defendant at the c district located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si; and (b) on the ground that the victim E, a police officer working at that district, is paying the taxi fee to the Defendant and returning home to the Defendant; (c) on the ground that he was arrested as the offender of the foregoing D and the current crime of interference with the business; and (d) on the opportunity that the several police officers of the victim’s compensation police officers hear “the year of smoking, the year of receiving taxes within the victim’s money”; (c) the year in which the victim’s compensation police officers were treated as the victim, and (d) the year in which the victim’s compensation police officers were born, and (d) the year in which the victim died and the year in which the victim died within the 20th anniversary of this year.

A. The victim publicly insultingd the victim by openly obsing the Plaintiff at the large interest of this year, “Ahh to this year.”

2. Determination

(a) An offense subject to prosecution upon complaint: Articles 312(1) and 311 of the Criminal Act;

B. On December 22, 2017, after the institution of the instant indictment, the victim’s withdrawal of the complaint was submitted.

(c) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparag. 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow