logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2018.05.10 2017고정567
자동차관리법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged is Bsch Rexroth driver.

No one shall cover a registration number plate or make it illegible, and shall operate such a motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, on April 17, 2017, the Defendant operated a registration number plate on the front registration number plate of the vehicle in the front of the said vehicle at the Heung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seo-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu.

Judgment

1. The defendant alleged that he had consistently carried a vehicle that was held by the investigative agency from the time when he died to the present court, and the defendant was entirely unaware of the fact before he controlled the fact.

The argument is asserted.

2. Article 81 subparagraph 1-2 of the Motor Vehicle Management Act provides that a person who shields a registration number plate or makes it illegible on purpose, in violation of Article 10 (5) (including cases applied mutatis mutandis under Articles 10 (7) and 52) shall be punished;

Therefore, in order to hold the defendant liable for violation of the Automobile Management Act, the fact that the defendant intentionally posted a counter-sick on the number plate of the vehicle in this case must be proved without any room for reasonable deliberation.

Examining the evidence duly admitted and examined, the Defendant registered the vehicle as indicated in its judgment in the name of his father around May 16, 2016, and recognized the fact that in the vicinity of this court on June 16, 2016, the Defendant was subject to the control by means of the violation of spirits at the time of 26 minutes around June 23, 2016, and the photograph marked on CCTV, it appears that the number of the front number of the above vehicle is posted, but it appears that the Defendant was subject to the comprehensive inspection of the foregoing vehicle on November 18, 2016, but did not have any particular points at the time. Even if it can be identified on the above parking control photograph, such circumstance alone alone alone is without a reasonable doubt that the Defendant directly posted the said Stick.

arrow