A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, together with C, made the victim D (math, 17 years of age, brain-dead disabled person) to engage in sexual traffic and divided the price into two parts.

On September 2012, the Defendant and C got the victim to share the price by using the name of the victim only in the case of the victim, and caused the victim to share the price in the center of the food felel in Seocho-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City on September 1, 2012.

At around 14:00 on September 20, 2012, the Defendant sent the victim’s cell phone numbers to the victim, who reported the page and expressed his/her intention to engage in sexual traffic, in the “GPCs” located in the “GPCs” located in the Young-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on September 20, 2012.

In addition, at around 15:30 on the same day, the Defendant had the victim engage in sexual traffic, receiving 100,000 won from any conspiracy located in the So-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I, Seo-gu.

In addition, the Defendant and C received 100,000 won from that time until September 25, 2012 from that time and had the victim engage in sexual traffic in two times, such as the set forth in [Attachment Table 1 and 2].

Accordingly, in collusion with C, the defendant solicited the victim who is a juvenile to become the partner in the act of buying sex of the juvenile.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each prosecutor's office protocol concerning the accused or C (including each part of the statements ofC and D);

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police officer against J, K, L, M, or H;

1. Each police statement made to D or N;

1. Each investigation report (the attachment of photographs of victims D human pictures, reporting on the filing of indictments for related cases, reporting on the sentence of judgment in C1st instance of the upper suspect);

1. With respect to the confirmation of GPcpc counter peand statement of employees in each internal investigation report F, related to the impossibility of extracting the number of the victim D's counter monetary calls, which is related to the impossibility of extracting the number of the victim's mobile phone number, the victim's pec counter investigation and pecal investigation into the crime of compelling sexual traffic, and the victim's cell phone number in each of the victim'