logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.01.30 2017가단94233
대여금
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

(a) Defendant A and B pay 7,603,561 won jointly and severally;

B. Defendant A and C shall be jointly and severally 345,643.

Reasons

In full view of the respective entries in Gap evidence No. 1 (including the provisional number) and the overall purport of the pleadings, it is recognized that the causes of the claim are the same as that of the attached Table (the "creditor" shall be deemed to be the "Plaintiff," and the "debtor" shall be deemed to be the "Defendant," barring any special circumstance, the defendants are liable to pay the plaintiff the unpaid principal and interest and the delayed damages,

The Defendants asserted to the effect that “the extinctive prescription for each of the claims of this case has expired,” but according to each of the above evidence, it can be known that there was a payment order or judgment that became final and conclusive as to each of the claims of this case, and that the lawsuit of this case was filed before the lapse of 10 years (in the case of claims established by payment order or judgment, the period of extinctive prescription is ten years) from

Thus, the plaintiff's claim is justified, and all of them are accepted.

arrow