logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.07.04 2017가단5059921
양수금
Text

1. The defendant shall pay KRW 13,000,000 to the plaintiff jointly with B.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

3...

Reasons

In full view of the respective entries in Gap evidence 1 through 5 (including the provisional number) and the overall purport of the pleadings, the fact of claim such as the attached Form (the "creditor" shall be deemed to be the "Plaintiff," and the "debtor" shall be deemed to be the "Defendant," and thus, the defendant is liable to pay the plaintiff the unpaid principal and interest and damages for delay as described in paragraph (1) of the

Although the Defendant asserts to the effect that “the extinctive prescription for each of the claims of this case has expired,” in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings as to each of the claims of this case, it can be known that there was a final judgment on each of the claims of this case, and that the lawsuit of this case was filed before the lapse of 10 years from the date the judgment became final and conclusive (in the case of claims established by a judgment, the period of extinctive prescription

If so, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable and acceptable.

arrow