logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.02.11 2014가단217966
양수금
Text

1. The Plaintiff within the scope of the property inherited from the network D:

(a) Selection E shall be 11,740,015 won and 8,414.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Korea Housing and Commercial Bank (hereinafter “Korea Housing and Commercial Bank”) set a maturity of KRW 50,00,000 to the network D on July 9, 1997, and agreed to comply with the interest and interest rate set by the bank.

B. On September 30, 1998, the non-party bank transferred the above principal and interest interest claim to the plaintiff (the Korea Assets Management Corporation prior to the change) and notified D of this on November 12, 1998.

C. As of December 11, 1998, D did not pay interest and overdue interest of KRW 15,945,204 from July 10, 1996 to December 11, 1998 on the balance of the loan principal of this case as of December 11, 1998, and KRW 18% per annum from December 12, 1998 to January 25, 199, and from January 26, 199 to August 17, 1999, the overdue interest rate of Nonparty Bank is 19% per annum from August 18, 199 to August 199.

D On October 6, 1999, as bereaved family members, died after having left the designated parties E, children G, H, Defendant (Appointed Party), Defendant B, C, and Appointed F.

E. G filed a declaration of renunciation of inheritance with Daegu District Court 99 Modan1652 on December 3, 1999, and H filed a declaration of renunciation of inheritance with Daegu District Court 9 Modan1706 on December 28, 199, respectively.

F. On December 16, 2003, Defendant B filed a qualified acceptance report with the Daegu District Court Branch of the Daegu District Court on December 29, 2003, and the report was accepted on December 29, 2003. On December 20, 2003, Defendant B filed a qualified acceptance report with the Daegu District Court Branch of the Daegu District Court of Korea on December 20, 2003, and the said report was accepted on January 5, 2004.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1 to 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. According to the above facts of recognition, barring special circumstances, for the Plaintiff within the scope of property inherited from the network D, for the Selection Party E to KRW 11,740,015 and KRW 8,414,544 among them, Defendant A, Defendant B, C, and Selection Party F to KRW 7,826,676 respectively and KRW 5,610,696 among them, respectively.

arrow