Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car in Category C.

On October 5, 2015, at around 08:40, the above vehicle was driven and the two-laned roads in front of the attached Do of Ansan City, Ansan City, are to the left left without being protected in the direction of F apartment settlement from the direction of E cafeteria.

Since a crosswalk is installed, a person engaged in driving service has a crosswalk, and even if there is an occupational duty of care to check whether there is a person, who will wear the road by reducing speed and checking the right and the right and the right of the road, the defendant's negligence of driving the crosswalk while neglecting it, which led to the left-hand side of the victim G (n, 24 years old) with the front-hand wheels of the vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence, such as “afford the brusium fford the brusium f for approximately six weeks,” which requires the victim to receive approximately two weeks’ treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each G statement;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on traffic accident-related photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The traffic accident of this case for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act seems to have occurred when the defendant did not discover the victim who had stopped on the crosswalk and entered the crosswalk. The degree of injury suffered by the victim is not easy due to the crime of this case, the confession and reflect of the defendant, the primary offender, the damage suffered by the victim due to the automobile insurance to which the defendant was admitted seems to have been recovered to a certain extent, and all other factors of sentencing as to this case are factors of sentencing, such as the defendant's age, the degree of negligence, circumstances of life, the result of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime.