Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Bchip car.

On January 15, 2014, the Defendant driven the above car at around 21:55, and received the front part of the D Ap-Wppp-W-on car from the victim C (25 years of age) driving, who was directly engaged in the above intersection from the right angle to the normal signal, due to the negligence of violating the signal on red signal from the right angle to the right angle, along with the cross-distance intersection in front of the arm’s length of the arm’s length of the arm’s length of the vehicle at the right angle from the right angle to the left side of the vehicle at the right angle.

As a result, the Defendant’s negligence in the above occupational negligence, thereby causing injury to the above victim, such as revolving parts of the right dog, which requires treatment for about six weeks, and the “chip” written indictment in the above Aburged case, is apparent that it is a clerical error in the “Aburgt”, and it does not affect the Defendant’s right of defense, and is corrected ex officio

A victim E (the 25-year-old) who is a passenger of a passenger car, suffered injury, such as the opening of a part of the opening of the right field to the right field, which requires approximately 6 weeks of medical treatment, and injury such as dystyping in the victim F (the 25-year-old age-old), and victim G (the 3-year-old age-old age-old), which requires approximately 2 weeks of medical treatment, is obvious that the 'burg' in the written indictment is a clerical error of the 'burg', and the employee is corrected since it does not affect the defendant

The victim H (the 72-year-old) who is the passenger of the car, suffered from the injury of the flive base of salt that requires approximately two weeks of treatment, and the victim I (the 58-year-old-old-old-age-age-age-age-age-age-age-age-age-age-age-age-age-age-age-age-age-age

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement to C and J;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Investigation report - Contents of CCTV video analysis, etc.;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a medical certificate (C), medical certificate (E), medical certificate (F), medical certificate (G), medical certificate (H), and medical certificate (I);

1. Article 3(1) and proviso of Article 3(2)1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts.