beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years on August 27, 2013 by imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) at the Incheon District Court on August 19, 2013, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on August 27, 2013.
The Defendant and B purchased a mobile phone in the name of D and F using the resident registration certificate of D and F, which had been used by the Defendant and B upon request of their friendship C, and F, sold the mobile phone in the name of D and F, sold it to others, and sold it by dividing the sales proceeds. After entering a car with E, the Defendant and B used the car at least four mobile phone sales stores, and was issued five mobile phone entry applications in the name of D and F by forging and forging the documents and using them.
1. On June 23, 2012, the Defendant and B conspired with H agency located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the 13:00-15:00 to 15:00 on June 23, 2012, the Defendant and B used the F’s resident registration certificate as if they were F, and submitted it to an employee who was unable to identify the name of F, thereby denying another’s resident registration certificate, and forged an application in the name of F, a private document on rights and obligations, which is a private document, in which the applicant’s personal information is recorded in the column of the application for joining a mobile phone kept there, and submitted it to an employee whose name is not known as if it was duly formed at the seat, and received from the employee the issuance of a ggalophone, a galophone, the market price of which is 96,900, a smartphone.
2. On June 23, 2012, the Defendant and B conspired with E, followed the J agency located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I on June 13, 2012, 13:00 to 15:00, and submitted the F’s resident registration certificate to K as if the E was F, thereby denying another’s resident registration certificate, and forged an application in the F’s name, which is a private document on rights and obligations, by stating the F’s personal information on the applicant column for the mobile phone subscription kept there.