logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.06.19 2014고단2029
장물취득
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 11, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for the acquisition of stolen goods at the Daegu District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on June 24, 2013.

1. On April 2012, the Defendant, along with B, C, and D, purchased smartphones that taxi passengers get from taxi engineers, and then sold them to a specialized business entity. The Defendant provided funds for purchasing smartphones, and the Defendant conspired B, C, and D to buy smartphones from taxi engineers.

On April 2012, 2012, the Defendant: (a) purchased gallon 1,30,000 won from the taxi platform prior to a bus terminal, even though he was aware that the gallon 1 price of the victim’s unclaimed taxi is the gallon 847,000 won in the market price of the victim’s name, which is the victim’s name, from the taxi driver, from B, C, and D; and (b) purchased gallon gallon 1,50,000 won in the market price of the victim’s name unclaimed taxi driver’s name, from the gallon 847,000 won in the market price of the victim’s name unclaimed taxi platform; and (c) purchased gallon 2,000 won in the vicinity of the gallon.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired stolens in collusion with B, C, and D.

2. From April 2012, 201 to the same year.

5. The Defendant, along with B, C, E, F, and D, purchased smartphones installed and sold by taxi passengers from the taxi professionals in the same manner as paragraph (1) and offered them to pay money in installments to the professional service provider. From around April 2012 to early May 2012, the Defendant: (a) from the taxi platform in the vicinity of the Macheon-gu bus terminal in Gwangju-gu and the regular business district in the same Gu, the taxi platform in the same Gu, the Defendant knew of the fact that the smartphones, which he acquired from the taxi engineers, are the stolen goods; and (b) from the taxi platform in the same Gu, the Defendant, even though he knows of the fact that the smartphones, who he acquired, are the stolen goods, 847,000 won in the market value, Y2 smartphones.

arrow