1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months;

2.Provided, That the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 18, 2018, at around 05:10 on February 18, 2018, the Defendant: (a) performed drinking together with the victim D (year 46) who was aware of himself/herself as a guest of the party room run by the Defendant in the Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si; (b) made a hot smell, which is a dangerous object on the table, from a portable gas park located on the table, on the ground that the victim took a bad speech; and (c) sustained a victim with the head and the 2-day picture of the unit that he/she was in need of approximately two weeks medical treatment.

2. On February 18, 2018, at around 05:10 on February 18, 2018, the Defendant interfered with business affairs: (a) at the main point of “C” operated by the victim E (V, 47 years of age) in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, the Defendant: (b) obstructed the business affairs concerning the restaurant business of the victim for about 5:10 minutes by force by using force; and (c) interfered with the business affairs concerning the restaurant business of the victim for about 10 minutes of 5:10 minutes of age.

Summary of Evidence

1. The witness D saw heavy smelling by the Defendant and embling the victim with heavy smelling materials.

E Influences, D is written by the victim as a snick (states).

Defendant Hahh was humping to Defendant, and was humping to Defendant:

The president of the F party branch had a strings to the other party.

조금 쳐서 튄 수준이 아니었다.

The defendant and the defense counsel at each court's statement are acknowledged to have inflicted pictures on the victim by sprinking the victim with sprinking sprinking a brut which was caused by the wind of the D's actions. However, the defendant and the defense counsel asserted to the effect that the State did not have aground for the victim, and that there was no intention of injury, but at the time there was no intention of injury. However, the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, such as the above witness's statement, CCTV video, the defendant's suspect interrogation protocol of the prosecutor's office, etc.