Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 15 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On November 10, 2010, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1,500,000 as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Seocheon District Court of Daejeon on November 10, 201, and on June 14, 2013, the Seoul Eastern District Court issued a summary order of KRW 3 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving).

【Criminal Facts】

1. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B franchise vehicle in violation of the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes Act;

On May 12, 2020, the Defendant driven the above vehicle while under the influence of approximately 0.157% of blood alcohol concentration around 21:50 on May 12, 2020, and led the road near Gangnam-gu Seoul to proceed into four-lanes from the private distance side of the friendly apartment to the private distance side of the Roman apartment.

At the time, many vehicles were stopped on the front side of the vehicle of the defendant, so in such a case, the defendant engaged in driving the vehicle has a duty of care to accurately operate the steering and steering gear, secure the safety distance from the front side and the left side, and prevent the traffic accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and led the victim D (Nam, 48 years old) who was standing on the front side of the same lane due to the negligence in the course of business, which led to the impossibility of normal operation due to the influence of drinking, as the Defendant’s vehicle, followed the part behind the E-Sz vehicle driven by the victim D (Seoul, 48 years old) and the part behind the Defendant’s vehicle, and led the victim F (F, South, 50 years old) to have the front part of the G SV vehicle driven by the victim F (F, South, and 50 years old). The Defendant again moved the vehicle and then moved the vehicle again, led the victim H (W, 44 years old), which was driving on the same lane, and led to the shock of the rear part of the E-Sz vehicle.

Ultimately, the defendant drives a vehicle in a situation where normal driving is difficult due to influence of drinking.