The Defendants’ appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. misunderstanding of the facts or legal principles (i.e., the Defendants did not allow I to engage in the commercial sex acts (the Defendants). Even if Defendant A arranged to engage in the commercial sex acts, Defendant B did not participate therein (Defendant B). Even if the Defendants arranged to engage in the commercial sex acts, they did not engage in the business (the Defendants). B) The sentence of the lower court’s unfair sentencing (Defendant A: 6 months of imprisonment, 2 years of suspended execution, 8 months of imprisonment, and 2 years of suspended execution) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The Defendants alleged that the lower court did not arrange to engage in sexual traffic at the lower court. However, the lower court convicted the Defendants of the instant charges on the grounds that: (a) the first police statement, the written statement by the prosecution, the written statement by the prosecution, the legal statement by the lower court, the first instance court, the passage to the conference of the building where G and entertainment centers are located; (b) G paid to the Defendants in the drinking value, etc.; and (c) the call details between G and the Defendant immediately after the her her her her her her her her arm

A thorough review of the judgment of the court below in comparison with records, and considering the following circumstances admitted by evidence, the court below conspired with the defendants for the business of arranging sexual traffic.

In light of the fact that there is no error of law that affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the facts, and there is no error of law that found the defendant B guilty of the charges of this case (the frequency of brokerage of commercial sex acts was limited to once, and it does not interfere with recognizing the act of brokerage of commercial sex acts, and in light of the status, role, partner, etc. at the main point of this case, it can be sufficiently recognized that the defendant B attempted to come to I.). (1) The prosecutor's office "the main point of this case is the place where commercial sex acts can be conducted with customers, i.e., secondary commercial sex acts with customers."