logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.12.24 2015고정3538
상해
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On March 6, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 23:30 of the facts charged in the instant case: (b) around 5, 2015, around 23:5, “D’s singing room located in the Dong-gu Busan Metropolitan City (hereinafter “D”); (c) took twice the back of the victim E (the age of 61); and (d) caused injury to the victim by taking part of the victim’s her her son’s her her her her her her her her her her her her b

2. The defendant, F, G, and H's statement, injury diagnosis report, false speech detection device inspection result, 112 reported details, on-site photographs, etc. are admissible as evidence corresponding to the facts charged in this case.

However, F is difficult to believe that one of the victims' daily behaviors on the part of the defendant was accused for a separate crime of harming the defendant. As a result of the detection of false words, the defendant's statement was shown as a response to the truth, and the victim's statement was shown as a response to the truth. However, the result of the inspection is merely a function as a circumstantial evidence to assess the credibility of the statement by the person who undergoes the inspection.

Next, G and H only make a statement that the victim had been faced with the defendant at the time and place stated in the facts charged, which means that the victim had been faced with the defendant, but did not directly witness the victim's face of assault from the defendant, and the 112 reported report also stated the victim's statement to the same purport, and on-site photographs also recorded the victim's face of the victim's face at the floor, and there is insufficient direct evidence for the cause of the injury.

In other words, in this case, the credibility of the victim's statement is the key point of the judgment, and the objective witness I and the J of Singing Ting Ting Ting Ting Ting Ting Ting Ting Ting Ting T having failed to regard the defendant as entering a five room, and when the victim is in a five room, the defendant was in a six room, and the J appears to enter five room because the victim did not have a single person in a five room.

arrow