The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. On November 25, 2016, the Defendant: (a) stolen the instant facts charged in a manner that, in the case of “D” room located in Sinsi-si, Sinsi-si; (b) in the case of “D” room, the victim E, who was located on the PC table No. 5, a cash of KRW 20,000, the market price of KRW 100,000, the market price of which was 100,000.

2. As evidence that seems to correspond to the facts charged in the instant case, there are statements and investigation reports in E investigation agencies and in this court (pates of investigation results).

However, in full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence adopted and investigated by this Court, it is difficult to believe that each of the above statements in investigation agencies and in this court is in trust, and even if so, it is difficult to believe that each of the above statements is in trust.

However, it is not sufficient to recognize the theft of the defendant only by the above statement because it is impossible to eliminate the possibility of theft of E from the room specified in the facts charged in this case by other persons than the defendant. The investigation report (written investigation result response) is a result of the investigation of the detection of false statements against the defendant, using the method of comparative inspection of the research area developed by the U.S. E, U.S. E, E, if the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is false, a change in a certain psychological condition occurs, the change in the psychological condition necessarily causes a certain physiological response, and it can be determined accurately whether the defendant's speech is false or not by such physiological response, or that it is insufficient to recognize that the above three premise requirements can be determined accurately by the above examination method (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2005Do1305, May 26, 2005).

(1) E is a witness in this court, with a limit of one million won used at the time.