logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016. 05. 12. 선고 2016두33582 판결
(심리불속행) 주소지 외의 장소에서 명시적으로 수령을 위임한 자가 수령한 고지서는 적법한 송달임[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court (Chuncheon)-2015-Nu-306 ( January 18, 2016)

Title

(C) The notice received by a person who expressly delegates receipt at a place other than his address shall be duly delivered.

Summary

(b) Even if the notice is not served by the address, if it is served to the person who expressly delegated the receipt, it shall be deemed to be a lawful service.

Related statutes

Article 10 of the Framework Act on National Taxes

Cases

2016Du33582. Detailed global income and confirmation of invalidity of disposition

Plaintiff-Appellant

NewA

Defendant-Appellee

BB Director of the Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court (Chuncheon) Decision 2015Nu306 Decided January 18, 2016

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Examining the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal, the ground of appeal by appellant is examined.

Since the grounds under each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents are not included in the grounds under each subparagraph of paragraph (3) or are deemed to fall under each subparagraph of paragraph (3), the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act.

arrow