beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
In collusion with telephone financial fraud assistance officers whose name is unknown, the head of the office of the first name "the head of the C office" intended to acquire money by deceiving victims under the pretext of guarantee insurance premiums and fees, etc. as if he/she will misrepresent the employees of financial institutions, etc. and cause the loan.
Accordingly, the chief of C office included the Defendant, etc., and the Defendant, upon the direction of the chief of C office, conspired in order to collect cash cards from the unoffendered accomplices and withdraw the money transferred to the account connected with the said cash card and deposit the money again into the account under the name of the Defendant.
1. No person who violates the Electronic Financial Transactions Act shall issue a transaction request in electronic financial transactions or take over any electronic card or a password necessary for using such card in order to secure the authenticity and accuracy of users and the details of such transaction;
Nevertheless, around November 20, 2013, the Defendant received cash cards in Chapter 18 listed in the attached Table 18, including a cash card (credit card number:E number) for the post office accounts in the name of the non-offenders, according to the aforementioned roles shared in the street in front of the Hasan-dong in the Changdo-dong, North Korea.
Accordingly, the defendant acquired the means of access used in electronic financial transactions in collusion with C head of office, etc.
2. On October 24, 2013, at around 16:20 on October 24, 2013, an infinite accomplice called “NH Loan Counseling Co., Ltd. A customer NH Loan Counseling Co., Ltd. is confirmed to have a loan of KRW 40 million to Nonghyup Capital Co., Ltd., which can be refunded at low interest. However, he/she would receive a loan with the National Divers Fund, but at low interest, he/she would make a loan at low interest if he/she has repaid a loan of KRW 20 million.”
However, the above accomplice was not an employee of the agricultural cooperative, and the will or ability to lend to the victim.