The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (7 million won of a fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Although there are favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant's mistake and reflects on his own, there is a need to strictly punish the act of false indication of origin, such as the crime of this case, by infringing upon the consumer's right food choice and trust and impairing the sound distribution order of agricultural products, etc. The court below sentenced the reduced punishment compared to the punishment of summary order in consideration of the sentencing factors that have already been favorable to the defendant, and taking into account the circumstances leading up to the crime of this case, circumstances after the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, etc., it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable, and therefore, the above argument of the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.