The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (4 million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. The court below's determination that the defendant reflects his wrong and did not repeat again, and that the defendant does not have the same criminal record. However, as to the crime of this case, there is a need to severely punish social harm, such as infringing the consumer's right food option and trust, and impairing the sound distribution order of agricultural products, etc., such as the crime of this case. The court below seems to have sentenced a reduced punishment compared to the sentence of the summary order considering the sentencing factors favorable to the defendant. In addition, taking into account the circumstances leading up to the crime of this case, circumstances after the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and conduct, and environment, it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable, and the above argument of the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.