logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.05.11 2017누35198
강등처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The court's explanation concerning this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the court's explanation concerning this case is acceptable as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420

(2) The court below's decision on the ground that the plaintiff's appeal is justified, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices, even if the plaintiff's appeal is not significantly different from the plaintiff's assertion in the first instance court, and all of the disadvantages of the plaintiff due to the disciplinary action in this case and the evidence presented by this court are considered, since the disciplinary action in this case cannot be deemed to have abused discretion.

arrow