1. The Intervenor’s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are borne by the Intervenor joining the Defendant.

purport.

1. The grounds asserted by the intervenor in the first instance court while filing an appeal by the intervenor in the court of first instance are not significantly different from those alleged in the first instance court.

Even if the intervenor takes into account all the circumstances alleged in the trial, it is recognized that the facts established and determined by the first instance court are justifiable, and it cannot be deemed that the dismissal of the intervenor on the ground of the grounds of the instant disciplinary cause is an abuse of the right to disciplinary discretion given to the plaintiff.

Therefore, this court's reasoning is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this court's reasoning is cited in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the intervenor's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.