logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.11.03 2016누560
명예퇴직수당지급거부처분취소
Text

1. After remand, the plaintiff's claim that is changed in exchange from the trial is dismissed.

2. The Plaintiff’s total costs of litigation.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The plaintiff passed the 30th judicial examination in 198, and was appointed as a judicial trainee on March 1989, and completed the Judicial Research and Training Institute on February 1991 after the two-year training period.

3. 1. Around February 2010, an application for the payment of honorary retirement allowances was filed to the Defendant, while serving as a judge, and submitted to the Defendant around February 2010.

On February 28, 2010, the Plaintiff voluntarily retired, and at the time, the Plaintiff’s age was 51 years of age and was 1 year prior to the expiration date of the Plaintiff’s age ( February 28, 2011).

(The plaintiff has been reappointed once during his service, and the number of years of service under the Public Officials Pension Act, including the period of active duty service, has reached 24 years).

arrow