logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.08.14 2014고단4851
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On March 4, 2003, at the 07:09, the Defendant violated the restriction on the operation of vehicles by a road management agency by operating the 3-scale cargo loaded with the 11.04t cargo exceeding 10t of the 3-scale cargo loaded with the 11.04t of D freight owned by the Defendant, in relation to the Defendant’s business at the 327.2km branch of the west Coast Highway, Seoul Metropolitan Office.

2. The Constitutional Court rendered a decision of unconstitutionality on the portion of Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; Act No. 7832, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 8315, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 8665, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 2095; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; Act No. 4777, Jan. 2, 2005; Act No. 83155, Oct. 2, 200) that “if an agent, employee, or other employee of a corporation commits an offense under Article 83(1)2,

3. Accordingly, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, a judgment of innocence is rendered under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure

arrow