The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged was around 14:27 January 16, 1997, the Defendant violated the restrictions on vehicle operation of the road management agency by driving the freight loaded at the third axis 12.3t and 4 11.8t of the B-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-do 10, Hancheon-do, Hancheon-do, Hancheon-do, Hancheon-do, 100, in relation to the Defendant’s business.

2. In the Constitutional Court Decision 2010Hun-Ga14, 15, 21, 27, 35, 38, 44, 70 (merger) rendered on October 28, 2010, the Constitutional Court ruled that “When an agent, employee or other worker of a corporation commits a violation under Article 83(1)2 with respect to the business of the corporation, the said corporation shall also be punished by a fine under the relevant Article” in Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005) that the prosecutor applied the facts charged in the instant case, the Constitutional Court ruled that “if the agent, employee or other worker of the corporation commits a violation under Article 83(1)2 with respect to

Accordingly, the above provision of the law was retroactively invalidated in accordance with Article 47(3) of the Constitutional Court Act.

3. According to the conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a crime, and thus, is acquitted pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.