logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2013.11.26 2013고단6426
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Larceny;

A. On May 3, 2013, around 19:10 on May 3, 2013, the Defendant: (a) had a total sum of KRW 69,000, 1 punishment for young children displayed in the victim D’s E store located in the Busan Seo-gu C4th floor; and (b) stolen them.

B. On May 3, 2013, around 19:12, the Defendant: (a) had the total amount of KRW 100,000,00 of the five punishment market prices of the infant’s clothes for children displayed at the victim F store located in the above C4th floor; and (b) stolen them.

C. On May 4, 2013, around 17:30 on May 4, 2013, the Defendant: (a) committed theft with a total of KRW 5,800,000, total market price of a child tension 1 set forth in the victim H’s I store located above C 4; and (b) committed a theft.

On May 4, 2013, at around 17:54, the Defendant, at around 17:54, has 39,900 won of the Megap market value displayed at the K store of the victim J on the above C5th floor, and stolen it.

2. The Defendant attempted to larceny at around 17:10 on May 4, 2013, and attempted to have an amount equivalent to KRW 59,00,00 in the market value of the 1st century, which was displayed at the victim L retail in the above C 1st floor, but did not have been aware of the fact by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning D, H, J, and L;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Articles 342 and 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that there is no previous conviction of a fine exceeding the same kind of fine, and that there is agreement with

arrow