1. The Defendant’s KRW 14,760,00 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from January 4, 2013 to July 2, 2014, and the next day.

Facts of recognition

In full view of the evidence Nos. 1-1 to 9-1, evidence Nos. 1-1 to 9 (including additional numbers), witness C’s testimony, and appraiser D’s request for appraisal and supplementary appraisal, the results of this court’s request for appraisal, and the purport of the whole pleadings as a result of the Plaintiff’s examination, the following facts

On April 16, 2010, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with C, the Defendant’s agent, and the Plaintiff, from the Defendant, to purchase a newly built multi-family house with the land size of 202 square meters in Daegu Seo-gu E-gu and its ground level of 650 million won.

In other words, the defendant completed the above multi-family house which was newly built and transferred to the plaintiff and transferred to the plaintiff.

The terms and conditions of the above contract include the following: “The defendant who is the seller and the purchaser shall complete the building at a F level (it is possible to modify the building under the agreement of the plaintiff who is the seller),” and “the defendant who is the seller shall conform to the architectural design drawing.”

After obtaining approval for the use of multi-family houses on June 3, 2010, the Defendant completed the registration of ownership preservation on June 8, 2010, and completed the registration of ownership transfer to the Plaintiff on July 30, 2010.

The expenditure for the plaintiff's direct repair work among the defects found thereafter is KRW 4,00,000, and KRW 1,200,000, and KRW 280,00,00,000, in addition to the injection of pins for the prevention of rainwater infiltration into the place of stairs, and KRW 5,480,00, in each household mold work.

Among the non-construction parts, the part that the Defendant had not constructed without consultation with the Plaintiff is the main pipelines of air-conditioner No. 203, the walls piping, the 2,3 multi-use rooms of the 2, and the 4th floor balcony, and the cost of the installation work is KRW 1,40,000.

Among the erroneous construction parts, the part constructed by the defendant without consultation with the plaintiff and the subsequent defect therefrom are the indoor infiltration, the part of feassive heat due to the error in the installation of a windowhead, and the part of the feassive heat due to the feassive infiltration of interior due to the feassing of the