(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2015.04.17 2014고단1078

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2015.04.17 2014고단1078

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등폭행)

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Justice] On February 21, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment with prison labor at the Gangnam Branch of the Chuncheon District Court as an attempted murder, and completed the execution of the sentence on August 30, 2013.

【Criminal Facts】

On October 6, 2014, at around 02:58, the Defendant, at the main point of “E” operated by the victim D(51) located in Gangnam-si C, said that “E” was “E Chewing,” and the Defendant boomed the victim as “E Chewing,” and that the victim booms with the beer and beer, which is a dangerous object on the test table, and that the victim booms the beer and the beer, which is the dangerous object on the test table.” The Defendant assaulted the victim in a way that the victim flicks the beer and flicks with the beer.

In this respect, the defendant carried dangerous objects and assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Partial statement of witness D;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Previous convictions: Criminal history records, investigation reports (the confirmation report of repeated crime period, attachment of the same kind of power), and defense counsel asserts that the defendant does not constitute assault because the defendant had a beer and beer for the floor rather than having a beer and beer for the victim.

According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the defendant was suffering from beer and beer, G made a statement from the investigative agency to the purport that the defendant was suffering from beer and beer and beer, G made a statement to the purport that the defendant had been suffering from beer and beer and beerer, and D made a statement to the purport that the defendant had been suffering from beer and beerer and beerer in the first investigation agency, but D made a statement to the purport that the defendant had been suffering from beer and beer and beerer in the face of the floor in this court. However, D's legal statement is hard to believe in light of the fact that the defendant and G had been suffering from beer and beer, D and G were made at the investigative agency.

유사 판례

-춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2015.06.25 2015노193

-청주지방법원 제천지원 2015.04.30 2014고단571

-대전지방법원 서산지원 2019.05.01 2018고단780

-서울동부지방법원 2014.12.12 2014노941

-광주지방법원 순천지원 2019.10.24 2018고단2775